Surfing Simulation Probability..

Published on June 21, 2018

Science believes she encountered possible evidence that the Simulation Theory could be the truth where Scientists have found “digital like code” behind the smallest particles in existence; Quark(s). This code is (re)invented by Roberts Claude Shannon in the 1940’s, he was mathematician, engineer & cryptographer.


The code found behind every particle in the Universe was named after his (re)inventor; Shannon-Fano. It is a compression technique. It is very well possible this code is a door to unlocking possibilities within our Universe & beyond, since reality is possibly recreated (simulated) through the use of the technique.

The description of the code you can find right here; it is interesting I find.

Want to learn the Shannon-Fano compression technique? There are several ways of applying Shannon-Fano code. One way is following the scientific method of actually learning and applying the code used to observe, entangle & (thus) manipulate particles.

If you have in-between 10 and 20 million dollars you can buy a Quantum computer at D-Wave, there is a waiting-list. With this machine you can write digital code on “the peel(s)” of individual atoms. These atoms are super-cooled by the machine itself, where this allows the particles to be still enough to apply the entanglement procedure.

If you would use these particular particles in combination with (e.g.) Satellite Communication Technology, it would erase latency altogether (example). This is the case because copied particles will behave the same as Base particles (movement), ignoring time and space transferring information without any delay.

This implies the possibility of observing, influencing & controlling parts of dimensions and / or Universes from a distance without any lag if you use the right encrypting & decryption equipment. (Human) observation in the entangling process still plays a huge role.

Why observation is important? You can read here, I believe very interesting.

I personally am convinced that there are other method(s) of entangling particles without the need of “physical programming”. An example would be manipulating smaller, more selective “pockets” of particles; all of the same kind. Rather than individual particles.

The equipment used for this entangling method would be Photographic in nature.

Right now one of my personal goals is giving shape to a more detailed description of how to actually utilize an alternative entangling method. It would mean; interlocking groups of particles. I am curious if I can grow to prove this (now) theoretic method of entanglement.

I hope I have sparked your curiosity & interest in the topic(s) and decrypted the information I have gathered (until this point) well enough. I hope I did not make any description errors and I hope you have learned new things.


Rob Helmink | Potentials & Personal Projects

Published by fecd32


What do you think you gain with science?”

👥 ♻️ 🌐 🌱 🏥 👟 📅 📺 🔬 📱 🔎 🚖 💻 🔧 🌎 🎥 🎨 🎶 🏠 👍 📈 📰 🔒 🔥 🚀 🚗 ✉️ ✏️ 🍇 💡 💾 👾 💧 📚 🎓 ✈️ 🎮 ☎️ ☀️